Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 10:30:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com> To: dg@root.com, advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new picture of wcarchive Message-ID: <199905031530.KAA09442@free.pcs> In-Reply-To: <local.mail.freebsd-advocacy/199905021955.MAA29773@implode.root.com> References: <local.mail.freebsd-advocacy/Pine.BSF.3.96.990502112355.5183G-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <local.mail.freebsd-advocacy/199905021955.MAA29773@implode.root.com> you write: > IOlite, while interesting in principle, was nothing more than a proof of >concept and unfortunately isn't something that we would want to include in >FreeBSD. I spoke with the researcher at length about it. For this particular Could you elaborate a little about that? We just had Vijay over here to give a talk about it, and while interesting, it seemed a little limited. In particular, the immutable buffers would seem to preclude building data up in pieces for transmission, and they "cop'ed out" by still using normal mbufs for small data transfers. -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905031530.KAA09442>