From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 12:58:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873611065674; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:58:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218D88FC15; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AFFCB949; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:58:16 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 07:56:27 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p20; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201209301224.q8UCOG5o029237@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201209301224.q8UCOG5o029237@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210010756.27565.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 01 Oct 2012 08:58:16 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r241068 - head/sys/boot/i386/loader X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:58:17 -0000 On Sunday, September 30, 2012 8:24:16 am Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > Author: ae > Date: Sun Sep 30 12:24:15 2012 > New Revision: 241068 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241068 > > Log: > Reduce the number of attempts to detect proper kld format for the amd64 > loader. Why not just put amd64 first always? To date the amd64 and i386 loaders have been identical (rather on purpose). If amd64 is the more common use case and worth optimizing for, I think it would be fine to just put amd64 first all the time (that order also makes the list sorted). -- John Baldwin