From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Oct 29 12: 8:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559BC14FFF
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bright@wintelcom.net)
Received: from localhost (bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA24549;
	Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 12:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: J McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: stupid root/toor question...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9910291958080.8801-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9910291229280.12797-100000@fw.wintelcom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, J McKitrick wrote:

> Looks like root IS toor.   <embarrassed>
> But why was everyone saying to use a different shell in toor and save sh
> for root in the event of problems?

Because it is the unix way.

-Alfred



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message