From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 10:15:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B858637B404; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-131.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9275143F75; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:15:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h3AHFSDt004446; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:15:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5/Submit) id h3AHFShh004445; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:15:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:15:28 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Wilko Bulte Message-ID: <20030410171528.GA4420@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Wilko Bulte , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org References: <200304100929.h3A9TLLn038460@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030410150629.GA18544@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030410150629.GA18544@freebie.xs4all.nl> cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/cgi query-pr.cgi X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:15:33 -0000 On Thu, Apr 10, 2003, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 02:29:21AM -0700, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > des 2003/04/10 02:29:21 PDT > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > en/cgi query-pr.cgi > > Log: > > Speed up PR lookup by about 100% by ignoring the "confidential" field, > > which we have never honored anyway. > > Interesting. core@ gets an email with 'confidential PRs' every week. > Not that I remember ever having seen something interesting in them but ok.. GNATS has a misfeature where if you leave out the 'Confidential' field when composing a PR, it will automatically be marked confidential.