From owner-freebsd-security Mon Dec 28 14:56:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA06934 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 14:56:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pobox.com (narn-2-28.mdm.mke.execpc.com [169.207.134.156]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA06921 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 14:56:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hamilton@pobox.com) Message-Id: <199812282256.OAA06921@hub.freebsd.org> Received: (qmail 27914 invoked from network); 28 Dec 1998 16:55:42 -0600 Received: from localhost (HELO pobox.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Dec 1998 16:55:42 -0600 To: Gustavo Vieira G C Rios cc: FreeBSD Security Subject: Re: xinetd In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Dec 1998 19:26:52 -0200." <3687F79C.42FEFA64@netshell.vicosa.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 16:55:42 -0600 From: Jon Hamilton Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <3687F79C.42FEFA64@netshell.vicosa.com.br>, Gustavo Vieira G C Rios wrote: } I would like to increment my system secutity, so i decided to install } xinetd, so i got version 2.1.8.5, but it simply don't compile, Does } anybody here have the same problem with this version ? } My FreeBSD version is: 2.2.8-Stable Why not use the port? It compiles fine, and is a newer version (2.2.1) to boot. -- Jon Hamilton hamilton@pobox.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message