Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:14:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 215989] shells/lshell: Update to 0.9.18, take MAINTAINER'ship Message-ID: <bug-215989-13-ftQ2kgCsZc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-215989-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-215989-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215989 --- Comment #11 from Damien Fleuriot <dam@my.gd> --- Kindly find attached the svn diff to bring lshell up to the latest commit h= ash 279d7ab [1] * The port passes both 'portlint -C' and 'port test'. * The offsets for files/patch-lshell_checkconfig.py have been adjusted to t= his latest commit hash. * The patch files/patch-lshell_shellcmd.py needs to be removed since a lot = of code was refactored in 0.9.17. I am unclear as to whether I should handle the extraneous patch file's dele= tion in post-extract ? Quote [2] : If a file must be deleted, do it in the post-extract target rat= her than as part of the patch. Seeing as we're fetching against a commit hash, I've taken the liberty of setting PORTREVISION to the commit's date. I believe this also elegantly solves the problem of having no 0.9.19 releas= e. I'll gladly heed any advice if you think there is yet room for improvement. Will submit confirmation of poudriere runs as soon as I get a HEAD host up = with the proper jails. The port does pass "manual checks" on 10-STABLE , as in managing to run it = and failing to exploit previous shell escape vulnerabilities. [1] https://github.com/ghantoos/lshell/commit/279d7ab7980ed88c6628e6621918f6299= a2e2e32 [2] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/slow-patch.html --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-215989-13-ftQ2kgCsZc>