Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:44:28 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        uboot@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 263543] sysutils/ed2k: Fails to build with GCC 11 (all flavors)
Message-ID:  <bug-263543-39090-tZYkdeRc05@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-263543-39090@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-263543-39090@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263543

--- Comment #2 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> ---
A separate, additional note tied to being able to build
on aarch64 . . .

The Makefile that I used to test building to match the
EDK2 material used in https://github.com/pftf/RPi4 ended
up with the following:

USE_GCC=3D        11:build
# Note:
# I needed to use a -Wl,-rpath=3D/usr/local/lib/gcc* to work around
# FreeBSD's /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 having incomplete/inaccurate
# coverage for aarch64 g++ code generation's use of libgcc_s.so.1 .
# Otherwise tools built, such as VfrCompile, get the following
# when run: "ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.5.0
# required by /usr/local/lib/gcc11/libstdc++.so.6 not found".
# I did not see a supported way to have an automatically
# adjusting -Wl,-rpath=3D/usr/local/lib/gcc* .
. . .
# Avoid: "ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.5.0
#         required by /usr/local/lib/gcc11/libstdc++.so.6 not found"
# (that is from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 having incomplete/inaccurate
# coverage for aarch64 g++ code generation's use of libgcc_s.so.1 ):
EXTRA_LDFLAGS+=3D -Wl,-rpath=3D${LOCALBASE}/lib/gcc11

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-263543-39090-tZYkdeRc05>