From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 21:13:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A19316A417; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 21:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AA413C48A; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 21:13:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E03449F1; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:33:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:33:02 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: Y0uCKhTQIglpwkHONVmMYpYUjBRmSHSII74O/JhG2+RI 1194021182 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15FE274D6; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:33:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <472B513C.9000307@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:33:00 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070928) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yar Tikhiy References: <200710271957.l9RJvfWH049713@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200710271957.l9RJvfWH049713@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_disc.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:13:28 -0000 Yar Tikhiy wrote: > yar 2007-10-27 19:57:41 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/net if_disc.c > Log: > Add a comment explaining why disc(4) bears the IFF_LOOPBACK flag. > It should be the final follow-up to an old yet unfinished discussion > on whether IFF_LOOPBACK is necessary for disc(4) and why. > Thanks for doing this. It is also worth noting that blackhole routes in the forwarding table rely upon there being a lo(4) interface in the system unless fast forwarding is enabled. This is a 'gotcha' which people may not be aware of, though I think I may have commented it somewhere... BMS