From owner-freebsd-security Wed Oct 13 17:59:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from tok.qiv.com (tok.qiv.com [205.238.142.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9FE152C8 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:59:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdn@acp.qiv.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tok.qiv.com (MailHost/Current) with UUCP id TAA06673; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 19:59:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost) by acp.qiv.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA01272; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 19:37:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jdn@acp.qiv.com) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 19:37:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Jay Nelson To: "f.johan.beisser" Cc: Greg Lewis , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeSSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> In the interests of minimising bloat we could balance its inclusion by >> deleting something like, say, uucp. >> (:-) for the uucps users) > >actually, i don't think this is a good idea. there are still a few (very >few.. i hope) networks and LAN's that use UUCP for mail transfer and such. >in keeping FreeBSD as portable and usable by as many users as posable, it >would.. well, screw them over. I'll second that opinion, though I have to admit, ssh is the second thing I install;) -- Jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message