From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 15 23:16:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DCD16A421 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QI=fcf86e1f@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C7B13C467 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QI=fcf86e1f@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FFCD0501 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:16:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:15:56 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071115231556.0b3a37a4@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071115220407.GB76155@demeter.hydra> References: <4738C145.2050601@chuckr.org> <20071112214240.5d3b048a@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4738CB99.5000807@web.de> <20071112235921.11ae8c0a@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4738FFC7.7000309@chuckr.org> <47394287.6050303@gmx.de> <473CA416.2040300@chuckr.org> <20071115205131.6f31ba66@gumby.homeunix.com.> <473CB387.2090100@chuckr.org> <20071115214316.656e279c@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20071115220407.GB76155@demeter.hydra> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Ports with GUI configs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:16:02 -0000 On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:04:07 -0700 Chad Perrin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:43:16PM +0000, RW wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:00:55 -0500 > > Chuck Robey wrote: > > > > > > > I've already deleted the message that kicked me off, but it > > > looked to me that you were talking about the 10,000 ports I was > > > talking about, and that meant you were referring to new installs, > > > not upgrades. > > > > Why would anyone want to configure ports they don't want to > > install? > > I've been following this discussion without participating, but I have > a question: > > How does that question follow from the preceding, quoted statement? > I assumed that he meant all ports, 10,000 is of the same order of magnitude as the total number of ports (27000), but an absurdly high figure for a real system. Actually the total number of ports in the entire tree that support options is only 1447. And out of 821 ports installed on my KDE desktop machine only 140 do. The idea that anyone ever has to configure 10,000 ports is nonsense.