From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Jul 9 09:23:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A4C996387; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloud.theravensnest.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 848391E9D; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (cpc16-cmbg15-2-0-cust60.5-4.cable.virginm.net [86.5.162.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t699NSJX098260 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:23:29 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: theravensnest.org: Host cpc16-cmbg15-2-0-cust60.5-4.cable.virginm.net [86.5.162.61] claimed to be [192.168.0.7] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r285284 - head/lib/liblzma From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 10:23:44 +0100 Cc: Dimitry Andric , Adrian Chadd , Pedro Giffuni , Luigi Rizzo , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <01236D45-1D17-4899-9D13-D7E5A32B68E5@FreeBSD.org> References: <201507081836.t68IacJu069563@repo.freebsd.org> <559D9172.9040305@FreeBSD.org> To: NGie Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 09:23:32 -0000 On 9 Jul 2015, at 10:19, NGie Cooper wrote: >=20 > Yes, but this case will fail for gcc 4.3 ~ 4.4 through 5.x if you use > my recommended method... I think that=E2=80=99s probably fine. We basically have four cases that = we care about: - People who are using clang because it=E2=80=99s the system compiler = [works] - People who are using new clang from ports / svn because it=E2=80=99s = new and shiny [works] - People who are using gcc from base because it=E2=80=99s the system = compiler [works] - People who are using new gcc from ports / svn because it=E2=80=99s new = and shiny [works] The only people it doesn=E2=80=99t work for are the ones building = FreeBSD using an out-of-tree old GCC. There probably aren=E2=80=99t too = many of those=E2=80=A6 David