From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 18:59:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F0616A401; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from satosi.kimura@nifty.com) Received: from defg501.nifty.com (defg501.nifty.com [202.248.238.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6A313C468; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from satosi.kimura@nifty.com) Received: from userg502.nifty.com (userg502p.nifty.com [172.22.128.82])by defg501.nifty.com with ESMTP id m1NIlrUf002097; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:47:55 +0900 Received: from localhost (ntceast007078.east.dup.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp [220.209.196.78])by userg502.nifty.com with ESMTP id m1NIlAlh022131; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:47:10 +0900 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=userg502; d=nifty.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references: x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dP3cW7Jw1xFWuXJN4lGONryc3C4ix0VYZPIy9F8GU86BQfRbWWZ+esphf64Df8i3Q sNk9wufulUnKvThGAawGw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [220.209.196.78] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:46:43 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20080224.034643.730551440.satosi.kimura@nifty.com> To: volker@vwsoft.com From: Satoshi Kimura In-Reply-To: <200802230314.m1N3Ec1Y042666@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200802230314.m1N3Ec1Y042666@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/74159: [headers] [patch] fix warnings concerned with header files X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:59:55 -0000 Hi Volker, > Your problem may > still be true for older releases but is not seen anymore for a recent > release. I had sent a patch for three files, and result was as follows: (1) sys/cdefs.h : already modified (at least 6.2-RELEASE) (2) sys/kbio.h : not modified. (3) machine/mouse.h : not modified. (now, sys/mouse.h) As you pointed out, (2), (3) makes no warning on new gcc. (In principle, (1) also makes no problem, even if not modified.) > Do you agree to close this PR? yes. Sincerely yours. --------------------------------------------------------- Hi linimon, I cannot reply on http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=74159, because I cannot find how to make a comment on this page. So I reply by this e-mail. Sincerely yours.