From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 04:48:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403FA16A4CE; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 04:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BC643D2F; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 04:48:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1BDisH-0003pz-67 ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:48:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:48:13 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040414114813.GA12001@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, doc@freebsd.org References: <1081712536.258.7.camel@fast.mmercer.com> <20040411223801.GA60944@grummit.biaix.org> <20040414110148.GB24304@grummit.biaix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040414110148.GB24304@grummit.biaix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: permissions problem with installations from PORTS X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:48:16 -0000 Joan Picanyol probably said: > * Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav [20040413 19:58]: > > Pilot error. Your umask should be 022 or 002 when installing ports. > > Otherwise, you get what you ask for. > > May I disagree? I expected the ports system to use install to properly > set up permissions for all files. At the very least, it should be > documented somewhere. Seconded. No other OS I use installs files as part of a packaging system with different permissions depending on my umask at the time, ports failing to install properly due to a more restrictive umask is very annoying. P. -- pir