From owner-freebsd-qa Thu Apr 19 17:13:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E68137B422; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:13:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14qOXl-000M9X-00; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:13:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:13:01 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: "Chad R. Larson" Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New TCP Initial Sequence number code Message-ID: <20010419191301.X76500@FreeBSD.org> References: <20010418210948.N76500@FreeBSD.org> <200104192342.QAA08604@freeway.dcfinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200104192342.QAA08604@freeway.dcfinc.com>; from chad@DCFinc.com on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:42:05PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:42:05PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote: > As I recall, Ade Lovett wrote: > > We can easily pump "a shitload" of data through it. > > Is that one of those technical terms? Yeah. Roughly equating to 2000 parallel streams between two boxes, one before the patch, and one after, maxing out at PCI bus with gig-E cards back-to-back into /dev/null. No problems that I can see. Both machines performed flawlessly, and are now taking a breather by the pool until I put them (or boxes like them) into active service. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message