Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 10:16:34 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: j mckitrick <jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kerberos and bsd license Message-ID: <20000608101634.A38441@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <20000608021150.A69953@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org on Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 02:11:51AM %2B0100 References: <20000608021150.A69953@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 2000-06-08 (02:11), j mckitrick wrote: > but i was curious what everyone's thoughts were, especially., dare i say, > brett glass. is this a problem with bsd licensing? can this be corrected? > is the gpl better for protecting us from microsoft and other prorietary > monopolies? > > a friend of mine argues againts bsd licensing for this very reason. One retort is "GPL is a selfish license". I've only used it about three times, but every time the persion ran off in a rage talking about idiotic BSD zealots. Now they knows how I feel dealing with them. (Although maybe you had to be there, especially after the few minutes of unprovoked attacks against FreeBSD, the BSD license, and how BSD developers are going to destroy the world.) Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000608101634.A38441>