Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:52:55 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        soc-status@freebsd.org
Cc:        rudo tomori <rudotx@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: BFS scheduler weekly status report
Message-ID:  <201106060852.55215.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikN5%2B1Ehkd3zJmrc12f0wq7KmL38g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <BANLkTikN5%2B1Ehkd3zJmrc12f0wq7KmL38g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 5:15:20 pm rudo tomori wrote:
> Hi,
> the goal of my project is to implement a BFS - like scheduler into the
> FreeBSD. I started off with the original 4.4BSD code, and by iterative
> modifications I will develop a scheduler that matches the BFS design
> as specified in http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/sched-BFS.txt.
> 
> Last week I was performing benchmarks using sysbench and make world. I
> tried to minimize disk IO by using tmpfs. You can find more details at
> my project blog site rudot.blog.com
> 
> This week I will continue with running the benchmarks on other hardware.
> 
> After that I will probably continue by changing the mapping of thread
> priorities to a specific priority queue in the global run queue. The
> BFS uses only 1 queue for all time-sharing processes.

Are you not worried about cpuset functionality?

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201106060852.55215.jhb>