From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Jun 27 17:22:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70CDB81A78 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF662DC4 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id q79so71879547qke.0 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:22:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o8l6LOl1MJCnOzVHXpAsSv2JAKeCWP7XAM9j2XCfAs8=; b=ZEZA4bXNLHK911nQvYMPkszOjSQqr86K3boXAk0Qvx/PWtwfTEoUuS4o/4tUtwUEP5 QVnKAUaw4nsnde+4UJl0y+pT/GS9zFu/uS+Jo9WTEalAISWmn0858TaqDKvHxuVFERK6 HTelBHc8wVlFyssn5Wk3vE3vpULV7b9hL93cA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o8l6LOl1MJCnOzVHXpAsSv2JAKeCWP7XAM9j2XCfAs8=; b=gBzMvaShczDLcE18xg1HKf3HQTPmFva/d+LgPW5p7lEMJHh2/TlLy6eb45nMZZG0DT 7BjL2VOyXMkFiQI/Y/KT2w505Fk7lda8DeRBURv4BynUKRUdbnvUK1mPHWKNo2K1QWE1 49+nG3wiQXcOasLJvKLuvIzr4byFVbejU8WXjazq/VY5n3NVIlHB4Bxp9NU5aD6x49D/ nBgrjy+0Nwec42l+nNbgR+yZKzCd6MXcd4HcfsCSUkeBdvoFIyYZb0f51KY4D96SrpyF oLWITuXahVo9pMwHjNiUqTObOl6202KVXM5THcqzT9RH0yeTFK058OPWqtUUTeWkgS79 F8YA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI2bQ4mu6pqYzTBOTGJgoQ+0v+hTEyKmwAuO0vZ267r0bHaze5vMspo1jhVte40mQ== X-Received: by 10.37.116.207 with SMTP id p198mr12122294ybc.32.1467048129522; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.8.0.124] ([177.20.130.8]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i129sm4338360ywd.35.2016.06.27.10.22.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Bad rtwn(0) performance with RTL8188CE on -CURRENT after r302035 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20160627170619.GB28353@athena.sysfault.org> From: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:21:59 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160627170619.GB28353@athena.sysfault.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:22:11 -0000 Em 27/06/2016 14:06, Marcus von Appen escreveu: > Hi, > > thanks to previous efforts, the rtwn(0) connection for my RTL8188CE > wireless card is far more stable. It seems to come at the price of > relatively bad performance, though. After r302035 from avos@, I > can't get more than 500 kbit/s downstream from anywhere. > > Let me know, what information is necessary to isolate and correct > that issue. I'll gladly test it. :-) > > Cheers > Marcus I have helped doing some tests with the urtwn. You can try creating the interface with -ht parameter. Here this improves performance. []'s -Otacílio