From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Feb  1 10:47:48 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C0637B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat,  1 Feb 2003 10:47:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE30443E4A
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat,  1 Feb 2003 10:47:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4])
          by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP
          id <200302011847450010087ohne>; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:47:46 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA55425
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 10:47:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: split out patch
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302010256220.51808-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302011046440.55342-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

still no comments?

this patch seems to be working, but a review from another developer
would be good.. particularly re: the point mentionned..


On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:

> 
> I'm working on backing out david's patch.
> 
> Part of his megacommit was a patch that should ahve been separatly
> handled.
> 
> I have split it out..
> Can people have a look at it and see if it makes sense.
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/lock.diff
> 
> basically locks need to be per thread but were per process.
> 
> Can we just use a thread* for this?
> I think so but I wonder why it wasn't a proc* before..
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message