From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 3 12:30:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651B516A42D for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:30:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650BF43D4C for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:30:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j73CUJxr005220 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:30:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j73CUJS0005218; Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:30:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:30:19 GMT Message-Id: <200508031230.j73CUJS0005218@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Subject: Re: docs/84509: Update some items at porters handbook about Python and PORTDOCS X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 12:30:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/84509; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Vsevolod Stakhov , bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/84509: Update some items at porters handbook about Python and PORTDOCS Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:25:05 +0300 On 2005-08-03 15:49, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: >On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:09:16PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2005-08-03 13:41, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: >>> The port needs Python. Minimal required version can be >>> - specified with values such as 2.3+. >>> + specified with values such as 2.3+. >>> + Also versions range can be specified: 2.1-2.3 >>> >> >> No, please. The syntax of the new sentence is horrible. Perhaps >> something like this would be ok: > > Ok, thanks a lot, I've prepared modified version of this patch. Sorry, Cool! That was super-fast, thanks. The patch builds fine, and it looks fine, so feel free to commit it and close the PR > I'll try to improve my English grammar and style. I may have been a little more picky than necessary. Sorry for that; it wasn't meant as a personal comment towards your English grammar and/or style. If I have offended you and you do attend EuroBSDCon 2005, please let me buy you a drink or two :-)