From owner-cvs-all Mon Jan 1 22:32:33 2001 From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 1 22:32:30 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from green.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29A237B400; Mon, 1 Jan 2001 22:32:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (r11zwz@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.dyndns.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f026Vdw06863; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 01:32:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200101020632.f026Vdw06863@green.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Peter Wemm Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/db/recno rec_put.c In-Reply-To: Message from Peter Wemm of "Mon, 01 Jan 2001 21:13:26 PST." <200101020513.f025DQp86922@freefall.freebsd.org> From: "Brian F. Feldman" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 01:31:39 -0500 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm wrote: > peter 2001/01/01 21:13:26 PST > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > lib/libc/db/recno rec_put.c > Log: > MFC: rev 1.5 - fix handling of R_IAFTER > > Forgotten by: green Does this make us the de facto maintainers of this old version of DB? I can't imagine importing a newer version, even ignoring any license issues, due to the fact that it would make libc a /lot/ larger. There are probably tons of bugs never found and fixed in this version that never will be, but have been fixed in 2.x or 3.x. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message