From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 14 0: 1:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from neogw.osaka.iij.ad.jp (neogw.osaka.iij.ad.jp [202.232.14.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6C337B409 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 00:01:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keiichi@iij.ad.jp) Received: by neogw.osaka.iij.ad.jp; id QAA01015; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:01:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from keiichi01.osaka.iij.ad.jp(192.168.65.66) by neogw.osaka.iij.ad.jp via smap (V4.2) id xma001008; Tue, 14 Aug 01 16:00:24 +0900 Received: from keiichi01.osaka.iij.ad.jp (localhost.osaka.iij.ad.jp [127.0.0.1]) by keiichi01.osaka.iij.ad.jp (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7E70Gf02426; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:00:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from keiichi@iij.ad.jp) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:00:16 +0900 Message-ID: <86elqf15z3.wl@keiichi01.osaka.iij.ad.jp> From: Keiichi SHIMA To: Julian Elischer Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup In-Reply-To: <3B777442.59D83AC4@elischer.org> References: <4246.997609202@itojun.org> <3B777442.59D83AC4@elischer.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.1 (Stand By Me) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Internet Initiative Japan Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Julian, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > I tend to agree with itojun. Although I understand FreeBSD guys want > > to make code from KAME cleaner in terms of FreeBSD's own point of > > view, it will make future merge from KAME to FreeBSD harder. This is > > a trade-off issue, but at this moment, I think we'll still need > > further merge from KAME to FreeBSD, so I'd prefer keeping the code "as > > is" for a while. > > Although I understand KAME guys want > to make code from KAME cleaner in terms of KAME's own point of > view, it will make future merge from Almost anywhere else to FreeBSD harder. Let us express that KAME code is designed for all the *BSDs. We don't have enough resources to arrange KAME code for each BSD as they want to be. Althogh I understand your point that some parts of KAME code is not a FreeBSD's manner, but currentry, this is the best compromise to support all the BSDs with minimum efforts. Please understand our approach... --- Keiichi SHIMA IIJ Research Laboratory / KAME project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message