From owner-freebsd-git@freebsd.org Fri Jan 29 20:28:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-git@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B6B4F8A00 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=Z/9q=HA=FreeBSD.org=otis@ns2.wilbury.net) Received: from ns2.wilbury.net (ns2.wilbury.net [92.60.51.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "svc.wilbury.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DS86t2D91z3v7l; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=Z/9q=HA=FreeBSD.org=otis@ns2.wilbury.net) Received: from chemex.owhome.lan (gw-upc.owhome.net [188.167.168.254]) (Authenticated sender: juraj@lutter.sk) by svc.wilbury.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4E5245D043; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:28:13 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Subject: Re: git transition plan for base/user/cperciva/freebsd-update-build From: Juraj Lutter In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:28:13 +0100 Cc: freebsd-git , Gordon Tetlow , Colin Percival Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Alan Somers X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DS86t2D91z3v7l X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:28:22 -0000 > On 29 Jan 2021, at 21:12, Alan Somers wrote: >=20 > What is the plan to transition the > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/cperciva/freebsd-update-build/ = code? > It's not really a branch of src; it's more like an independent = project. > Will it be getting its own repository? This is a good question. The other question is if it could be simplified = somehow, for use cases where users do not want/need patches and only want to = build updates for their running systems for regular maintenance.