From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 16 08:36:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C078516A4CE for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:36:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A1343D3F for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:36:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no (amidala.datadok.no [194.54.103.98]) by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2G8aEBM068800 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:36:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:34:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Davour's message of "Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:47:00 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <86u0ncng4o.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW or pf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:36:37 -0000 Andreas Davour writes: > Can someone tell me if it's ok to just use IPFW on my STABLE system, or > is there some other knobs in the kernelconfig I should toggle to turn > off pf support? By default pf is compiled as a loadable module, which you load if you want to run pf, leave alone otherwise. Removing all traces of pf would likely take a bit of effort. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"