From owner-cvs-sys  Thu Feb  5 19:57:15 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-sys>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA14975
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:57:15 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-sys)
Received: from gringo.cdrom.com (root@ppp-037.tky.exa.co.jp [210.129.93.37])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA14860;
          Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:57:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@gringo.cdrom.com)
Received: from gringo.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by gringo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00659;
	Thu, 5 Feb 1998 19:56:02 -0800 (PST)
To: Alex Nash <alex@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Feb 1998 18:45:55 PST."
             <199802060245.SAA21957@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 19:56:01 -0800
Message-ID: <655.886737361@gringo.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Any "2.2.6 candidates" should just be committed straight in unless you
have reason to believe that they might not be kosher (in which case
one would wonder why it should be flagged as a candidate in any case ;).

I think we have a greater danger of me missing a pending change than
a bad change going in, and my testing efforts catch the latter cases
far more easily than they catch the outright omissions. ;-)

					Jordan