Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:02:50 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: math/ess CONFLICTS with devel/noweb, help with CONFLICTS= needed Message-ID: <4FD33B6A.7050206@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120609132520.42b0af28@dijkstra.cruwe.de> References: <20120608204143.5a1d780a@dijkstra.cruwe.de> <4FD268B5.4050103@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120609132520.42b0af28@dijkstra.cruwe.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig2E7DEFFD069ACDAB3647086C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 09/06/2012 12:25, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> Thanks for your quick answer. Incidentally, I am at this moment also
> preparing a maintainer update for a new version of math/ess. Should I
> perpare two PRs, one for the CONFLICTS and one for the actual update or=
> is it permissable to pack these two into one?
It is best to put all the changes you want to make into one PR. That
will get it processed most efficiently.
Cheers,
Matthew
--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
--------------enig2E7DEFFD069ACDAB3647086C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk/TO3EACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxiUgCeM7fJRBnSgRZ3QxaInN9cljbd
kkMAnjEkISxKzQuLgjiWBa9RZ/8ajuSY
=pS4+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig2E7DEFFD069ACDAB3647086C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FD33B6A.7050206>