Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Apr 2000 22:31:33 -0400
From:      Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>
To:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Removing ports maintainers
Message-ID:  <20000423223133.O397@jade.chc-chimes.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004231951580.331-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from chuckr@picnic.mat.net on Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 07:55:59PM -0400
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004231951580.331-100000@picnic.mat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 07:55:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:

> If this is being done because Kris can't get a response when he wants
> changes, and he doesn't want to wait, I think that possibly he's doing
> folks a disservice, because I think some mainatainer is probably better
> than none at all, and for the majority of what he's doing, that's going to
> be the ultimate effect.

The exact opposite is true: a deadweight maintainer stalls progress and
PRs that "wait for MAINTAINER feedback" that never arrives.

Maintainership is not a passive state.

-- 
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect
Computer Horizons Corp - CVM
e-mail: billf@chc-chimes.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000423223133.O397>