From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 12 12:57:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83A116A4CF
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:57:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (bones.rvdp.org [213.154.224.58])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A40143D1F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:57:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rvdp@rvdp.org)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7CCvWRX001493;
	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:57:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rvdp@localhost)
	by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7CCvVVY005816;
	Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:57:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:57:31 +0200
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20040812125730.GB20845@rvdp.org>
References: <200408120202.i7C22HTT000463@drugs.dv.isc.org>
	<20040812120155.GA20845@rvdp.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040812120155.GA20845@rvdp.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:57:40 -0000

On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 14:01:56 +0200, Ronald van der Pol wrote:

> So, maybe something changed getween July 17th and now. I will
> see what happens after an upgrade to the latest 4.10.

Yep, I have the same problem with the latest 4.10: no ICMP6
packet too big packets are sent.

	rvdp