Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 22:52:13 -0700 From: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> To: Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org> Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/66404: New port: x11-servers/X.org-devel Message-ID: <1084168333.54825.31.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <20040509084228.GB16043@aoi.wolfpond.org> References: <200405082350.i48NoTeN014588@freefall.freebsd.org> <1084090864.1492.40.camel@leguin> <20040509084228.GB16043@aoi.wolfpond.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-rRiK+jGcEHu1Ejj/GdV5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 01:42, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 01:21:04AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 00:09, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > > > > I'm also working on building ports similar to XFree86-4 ones; I have put > > > an archive here: > > > > > > http://www.thinbsd.org/Xorg-ports-2004-05-08.tar.gz > > > > > > I'm currently running a mix of these ports and XFree86-4.3 parts. Be aware > > > that this is a work in progress and may not work at all on your machine. > > > > Thanks. I'm planning on taking a slightly different route, though (and > > I'll try to explain for others who've been asking me): > > [...] > > > As far as current status, I'm running the X.Org server on my machine > > with the mix of X.Org and fd.o libraries we have (with a few more that > > are uncommitted). > [...] > > Is there any place were these can be downloaded ? CVS, now. I think I got it all in there, including the server. > > The next steps, off the top of my head: > > [...] > > > - Check xorg-server build on non-x86 > > This should not be a problem: my primary workstation is an amd64 machine > and the server is working nicely on it. > I believe I only had to add a small patch for pci stuff. Excellent, I'd be happy to get patches for it. > > - prepare XFree86-4-Server to coexist with and depend appropriately on > > the new libraries > > If the new Xorg-server could be made to work with these from the beginning > it would be a sure win :) It does. The concern is keeping existing ports working after we throw the switch. But that's a ways off still. The patch attached is what I've been using to make other ports depend on xlibs. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org --=-rRiK+jGcEHu1Ejj/GdV5 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=xlibs-bsd.port.mk.diff Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=xlibs-bsd.port.mk.diff; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Index: bsd.port.mk =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.488 diff -u -r1.488 bsd.port.mk --- bsd.port.mk 19 Apr 2004 23:39:52 -0000 1.488 +++ bsd.port.mk 10 May 2004 04:57:06 -0000 @@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ LIB_DEPENDS+= X11.6:${PORTSDIR}/x11/XFree86 .endif .else -LIB_DEPENDS+= X11.6:${PORTSDIR}/x11/XFree86-4-libraries +LIB_DEPENDS+= X11.6:${PORTSDIR}/x11/xlibs .endif # Add explicit X options to avoid problems with false positives in configure .if defined(GNU_CONFIGURE) --=-rRiK+jGcEHu1Ejj/GdV5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1084168333.54825.31.camel>