From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Dec 12 15: 0:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F10C37B401 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:00:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B230A43EB2 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:00:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBCN0b82009225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:00:37 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id gBCN0W507960; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:00:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15865.5392.284364.522752@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:00:32 -0500 (EST) To: "Drew Tomlinson" Cc: Subject: Re: SOLVED - Linux_Base Port - Any Workarounds? In-Reply-To: <015b01c2a22e$7705cf60$6e2a6ba5@tagalong> References: <013801c2a216$5daca150$6e2a6ba5@tagalong> <15864.59185.414664.544704@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <015b01c2a22e$7705cf60$6e2a6ba5@tagalong> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Drew Tomlinson writes: > Thank you very much!!! I did search but apparently I missed the "osf1" > module requirement. With osf1 loaded, does that mean that most things > for Tru64 will work? Most things without threads, yes. Tru64 uses Mach IPC in their threads lib, and we don't emulate that. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message