From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 11 17:10:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D3C106566C for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18E58FC0C for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4BHACdI032875 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:10:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q4BHACS0032874; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:10:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:10:12 GMT Message-Id: <201205111710.q4BHACS0032874@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Michael Scheidell Cc: Subject: Re: ports/167405: EFL updated to 1.1.0 and E17 updated to svn 65643 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Scheidell List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:10:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/167405; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Scheidell To: Cc: Subject: Re: ports/167405: EFL updated to 1.1.0 and E17 updated to svn 65643 Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:00:04 -0400 looks like a lot of patches, yes, too many to upload to GNATS, so I agree that you can't attach them here. Grzegorz: I spot checked one of them, since multiple patches for multiple ports makes it a really difficult job for the committer. This one I spotchecked is going to be indicative of the rest of these patches, it will make this really difficult since the committer is going to need to edit all of these patches by hand and try to sort them out: Any time you see something like this in a patch: it indicates that the submitter did not apply the patch against current portstree. (and we will need to take this line out or the cvs update will fail) -# $FreeBSD: ports/x11-wm/enlightenment/Makefile,v 1.124 2012/04/10 18:04:10 rm Exp $ +# $FreeBSD: ports/x11-wm/enlightenment/Makefile,v 1.122 2011/10/24 03:33:20 stas Exp $ # Something else that would help is if you used anon cvs so that you could do a cvs diff (which would include "Index:", so that the committer could patch a combined diff with: patch -EuN -I -i /tmp/combined.diff. (Q: I see in Mk_bsd.elg.mk.diff a change in maintainer from ports@ to stas@ ? Q2: just so that the committer doesn't need to look through 84 ports files, you are the maintainer of all of these ports? or are taking maintainership from ports@? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell