From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 21:30:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C10CF466; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94103BC7; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.120.92] (095-097-241-198.static.chello.nl [95.97.241.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B0643BD4; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:30:23 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <540F716D.8020001@marino.st> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 23:30:21 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery , marino@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?B?QmVybmhhcmQgRnLDtmhsaWNo?= Subject: Re: svn commit: r367769 - in head: . emulators emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy References: <201409091918.s89JIStw037486@svn.freebsd.org> <540F6D8A.30907@marino.st> <540F704B.7070209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <540F704B.7070209@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 21:30:36 -0000 On 9/9/2014 23:25, Bryan Drewery wrote: > virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy does not have a dependency on unstaged > emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy. Naturally decke@ was not notified. Okay, so the issue is the kmod port? I didn't realize it had a function by itself, I thought it existed solely for virtualbox-ose-legacy. > It is not proper to remove a port without a deprecation period if it > works and has no other reason to be removed. > > btw decke@ still is a portmgr. The language is inexcusable. If virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy is useful by itself, I'm happy to restore it. John