From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  7 14:58:35 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A0216A418
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu,  7 Feb 2008 14:58:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E208913C448
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu,  7 Feb 2008 14:58:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender:X-Spam-Status:Subject;
	b=al9bIKJU/t1po8B320aSfSJv8EscF7BNE8GKFmYGC8PGhQ6OB6Tof7ARX227qth7d1JxiLFLSNndaHz6SaQ9wqSlV4M+442yGrp8tY0BCvTDoL7bCko9oB9xTURm2kH4a9131YGK/KW7iK+j2FkId6AiRdgiQ+VYvRkpC8KtqZA=;
Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25])
	by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	id 1JN8Cv-000A8w-6L; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:58:33 +0300
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:58:32 +0300
From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
To: Josef Pojsl <jp@tns.cz>, Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>,
	freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <Ntfg81bhcEB6BPmKzMb2iTN9oBA@ebJhc+9glC7W5vxxBJVH9quBZr0>
References: <20080206144104.GL1122@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<jV/l2UkZT+CCNuE6npJv1SBs5CE@UCvaDHSF+GDEPQ7TSpdR+lgUSQM>
	<20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<20080207141422.GG11393@diehard.n-r-g.com>
	<20080206144104.GL1122@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<jV/l2UkZT+CCNuE6npJv1SBs5CE@UCvaDHSF+GDEPQ7TSpdR+lgUSQM>
	<20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080207141422.GG11393@diehard.n-r-g.com>
	<20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>
Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:58:35 -0000

Josef, Claudio, good day.

Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:49:44AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your remarks. I absolutely agree with you
> > that all columns are correct except the Nexthop.
> > 
> 
> The nexthop selection for point to point links had a bug in versions
> previous to 4.2. This should be fixed in the 4.2 and -current version of
> OpenOSPFD.

Thanks for confirming this: I had started to suspectethis after
some code digging.  Will try to update the port to 4.2, so expect
some patches "Really Soon" (tm) ;))
-- 
Eygene