From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 04:54:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B07016A41F for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 04:54:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.localelinks.com (web.localelinks.com [65.170.254.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C4843D48 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 04:54:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (adsl-12-34-209.jan.bellsouth.net [65.12.34.209]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.localelinks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5D02A for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:54:47 -0600 (CST) Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 9296220FFE; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:54:45 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:54:45 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Charles Swiger Message-ID: <20051103045445.GO1367@over-yonder.net> References: <502337639.20051102220924@paranoid-zine.com> <2C66C948-04D0-4576-A158-992AAE5BECB8@mac.com> <273200033.20051102224545@paranoid-zine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i-fullermd.2 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Peter Gregorc Subject: Re: Re[2]: nat exclusion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 04:54:50 -0000 On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:55:32PM -0500 I heard the voice of Charles Swiger, and lo! it spake thus: > On Nov 2, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Peter Gregorc wrote: > >I've got 86.61.75.240/30 > >.241 is for BSD > >.242 for WS1 > >.243 broadcast > >So two are usable for outside usage, if NAT is disabled. > > Sure, but normally, either .1 or .2 of a /30 subnet (ie, your .241 > or .242) is the externally-connected router of your ISP. A few of > the better ISP's will support switching their devices from being a > router to acting like a bridge, thus requiring you to provide a > dual- homed machine yourself. Presumably he's using the BSD box as the router (PPPoE). You can get away with a single NIC just fine; I go through PPPoE with the single NIC in my old 486 router, and forward ports internally. You want "nat unregistered_only yes" in the ppp.conf so it only NAT's private IP's and leaves public ones alone. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.