Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:02:57 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in>, Randy Katz <fastpoint@ccsales.com>, Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>, "questions@freebsd.org" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stop complaining about x11 please (was: Re: Why does PORTS SUCK so BADLY!?) Message-ID: <20000501150257.B391@argon.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <20000501114948.J24573@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Mon, May 01, 2000 at 11:49:48AM -0700 References: <009b01bfb389$96546cf0$b8209fc0@marlowe> <20000501101044.F24573@fw.wintelcom.net> <00b901bfb38f$e4625cd0$b8209fc0@marlowe> <20000501105116.B32172@ccsales.com> <20000501113038.I24573@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000501234432.A2998@physics.iisc.ernet.in> <20000501114948.J24573@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 11:49:48AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > OK, someone add "PORTS_MINIMAL=yes" to my wishlist. :) Well, this and a standardized method for enabling/disabling options in all ports needs to be setup. It's on my plate right now (but I probably won't have any code until June or so). Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@FreeBSD.org>'s portconf seems like one way to make the interface to these "options" as user-friendly as possible. And now back to our normally scheduled hacking.. -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000501150257.B391>