Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Jun 2004 09:48:56 -0700
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Cc:        Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
Subject:   Re: some broken ports?
Message-ID:  <200406040948.57120.peter@wemm.org>
In-Reply-To: <1086323628.48282.23.camel@server.mcneil.com>
References:  <1086323628.48282.23.camel@server.mcneil.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 03 June 2004 09:33 pm, Sean McNeil wrote:
> Am I missing something?  Is libtool suppose to handle this and isn't?
>  I cannot get several ports to compile without adding the following
> snip of code to the Makefile for each:
>
> .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64"
> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-pic
> .endif

I believe the problem is that libtool's test isn't adequate and it 
arrives at the conclusion that it is possible to use non-pic binaries 
in shared objects when in fact it just didn't test enough cases.  I 
don't know my way around its internals well enough though.
-- 
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406040948.57120.peter>