Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:25:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Unger <j.unger@addict.de> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/72631: the RELEASE_5_3_0 tagged INDEX-5 is much too old Message-ID: <200410130925.i9D9PBfx019867@crow.addict.de> Resent-Message-ID: <200410130930.i9D9UOGO080504@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 72631 >Category: ports >Synopsis: the RELEASE_5_3_0 tagged INDEX-5 is much too old >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: update >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Oct 13 09:30:24 GMT 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Juergen Unger >Release: 5.3-BETA7 >Organization: none >Environment: System: FreeBSD 195_49_136_2.jpru.de 5.3-BETA7 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 #0: Fri Oct 8 01:07:50 UTC 2004 root@195_49_136_2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >Description: INDEX-5 within ports-tree is outdated long ago. So various port do not build until the user has generated a new one. IMO with 5.3-RELEASE there should ship an INDEX-5 which is up-to-date. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: untag revision 1.20 of INDEX-5 from RELEASE_5_3_0, build a new INDEX-5 for the RELEASE_5_3_0 ports tree and submit this new one tagged for RELEASE_5_3_0. btw: IMHO it should be an predefinied step in the releng-process to build new index-files in the ports tree before tagging them for an release. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410130925.i9D9PBfx019867>