From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 17 09:52:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B945816A41F for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4123343D46 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jAH9tSb42042; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:55:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Victor Watkins" , Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:52:29 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1132111958.1410.16.camel@localhost> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Solaris patches and Solaris Express X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:52:33 -0000 Hmmm, We run a lot of Solaris 8 and FreeBSD. I find Solaris 8 pretty much the same speed as FreeBSD for what we do. However, one thing is that we do not run X-windows on either our Solaris 8 or FreeBSD systems, because they are servers and there is no need for it. I've generally not found trouble obtaining the patches for Solaris I've needed, most of them are in the cluster patch, and the ones that aren't yet are critical (such as the repaired ncsd program) are available on the Internet on non-Sun-approved websites. The performance of Xorg/XFree86 vs Openwindows is greatly different as you point out. It is possible to compile Xorg on Solaris 8, at least Solaris x86 - I've heard of people doing it but I've never done it myself. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Victor Watkins >Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 7:33 PM >To: kayo.granillo@sun.com >Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Solaris patches and Solaris Express > > > >> Do community member find these additional features worth the cost? > >No. > >We just want to get our patches without jumping through any hoops, or >worrying about if the check made it through the mail, or if Sun FUBAR'ed >our support account info rather than there being a problem with the >Update Manager connecting, etc. > >No longer personally worried about it though..I nuked my Solaris install >and have a nice, shiny new FreeBSD 6.0 kit now, and I gotta say, after >Solaris 5.10 x86, the speed difference alone is breathtaking. > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.3/173 - Release Date: >11/16/2005 >