Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:37:48 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors Message-ID: <87skosf02b.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20081213182336.V41178@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:24:13 %2B0100 (CET)") References: <20081213143200.GA5026@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <18755.53118.854987.966113@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20081213182336.V41178@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:24:13 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: >> Technical note: questions@ may be an appropriate forum for > > general discussion about FreeBSD, or general discussion about > thousands of unix software that runs on unices including FreeBSD? I don't see the difference. If a program runs on FreeBSD it runs on FreeBSD, so it _is_ something that FreeBSD users may be interested in for their every day work. Does it really matter if the particular piece of software also runs on AmigaOS? Not really, IMO :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87skosf02b.fsf>