From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 24 14:32:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA11809 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 24 Mar 1998 14:32:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA11780 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 1998 14:32:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA27230; Tue, 24 Mar 1998 14:25:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803242225.OAA27230@implode.root.com> To: "pratap singh" cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ARP REQUEST question In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Mar 1998 14:04:47 PST." <19980324220447.14324.qmail@hotmail.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 14:25:08 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Hi all gurus of Networking, >I have a basic doubt. Every layer has a cehcksum being calculated >whereas the ARP frame does not have. Can anyone throw light on this >please. Is it because the ARP packets donot traverse the LAN boundary >and error rates in LAN environment are very low compared to the WAN >error rates???? All ethernet packets have a 32bit CRC, so the arps are protected by that. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message