From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Oct 5 18:56: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD8B37B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13hMk0-000FYq-00 for chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 02:56:04 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA55564 for chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 02:56:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 02:56:04 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: .net threat ? Message-ID: <20001006025604.C55421@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From what I have read lately, M$ just might be onto something with this .NET idea. According to an article on Oreillynet, they are changing their approach, and this time learning from some of their past mistakes. Does this have any great impact on the ongoing OS war? Any thoughts? jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message