From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 18 14:45:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62EF37B401 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from secure-info.ca (jeamland.ca [66.11.170.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ABE143F3F for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:45:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stark@jeamland.ca) Received: (qmail 95662 invoked by uid 1029); 18 Jul 2003 21:46:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20030718214651.95661.qmail@secure-info.ca> From: "stark" In-Reply-To: <20030718152140.676365D07@ptavv.es.net> To: Kevin Oberman Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:46:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: Tobias Roth cc: "M. Warner Losh" cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with fxp0 on T30 with 5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:45:36 -0000 > ps2 is the IBM utility to adjust BIOS parameters. While these can also > be adjusted under Windows, many are never written to CMOS and are lost > on re-boot. (Windows re-loads them from the registry.) ps2 will change > the values in CMOS memory. I couldn't get ps2 to tell me anything interesting, but I entered the BIOS and put 5,7,9,10,11 for the first 5 PCI IRQ ids and left the last three on auto and ta-da! everything seems to be working. I'm using the GENERIC 5.1-RELEASE kernel so it's using cbb already (someone had asked that) and I can't see that anything else is failing (I don't have wi-fi and I had already disabled serial, IR, and parallel, so USB is the only thing left :) Woo-Hoo! This is the first time I've had 5.x working completely on my laptop. I'm very very appreciative. Thanks everyone! (Now we should probably find out WHY we have to set the IRQ assignments manually, but seeing as it works I'm not in a rush to find out. Feel free to suggest code changes and I'll be a guinea pig though :) Dana Lacoste Ottawa, Canada