Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 10:15:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: jkh@freefall.FreeBSD.org, CVS-commiters@freefall.FreeBSD.org, cvs-share@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/FAQ/Text CONTRIB.FreeBSD Message-ID: <199508311715.KAA12054@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <10383.809884278@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Aug 31, 95 08:51:18 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > May I request that a ``Core team alumni section'' of this document be created > > to list all former core team members''. > > I have no problem with this. I'm even on record in the past as saying > that the "contributors" list is simply too large, and to lump folks > like Peter Wemm in with Charles Hannum is only an indictment of the > current layout. > > > I would also like to see the ``Founders'' list added to this, that should > > However, I'm also a little wary of splitting this up to the point of > being a little silly sounding. We, the founders, know who we are and > it's not like there are dozens of us requiring recognition! More > importantly, down this slippery lies, in my mind at least, an endless > procession of catagories: "Friends", "hackers", "writers", "spiritual > advisers", "groupies", "white-bearded gurus", etc.. I wouldn't want > us to become figures of fun in the operating systems' world here! :-) > > Can we toss around some other proposals before we start making changes? > > Your fundamental idea has merit, don't get me wrong, but I'd rather pick > 3 strong categories than 6 weak ones.. Agreed, toss the ideas around, but I would like to see action before 2.1 is cut. I would really like to see action within 7 days. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508311715.KAA12054>