From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 21:19:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3159A1FB2 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venture37@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0761605 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venture37@gmail.com) Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so110981079wig.0 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SxJ1OxxGF6MZbB5SQV0AJmSXq3acIprwjvVDnEiBf4c=; b=FL5bMhbpS2WOpuUgjzZkmETm9PjYIfwPVSxdPBBpowBlmXQiplzX256h0pt/14c0F5 I96pW887toFW4L9NYCPdgv4J5PtqlHxb4VmarfAMVlHA7m3GidKUrRsDZ7OH5BTo6Xhb ZLCs9vAkHAaf0B6q0EfyPzw1f8zVs1ddtmHhcT3cY9zFSCfrXeUrYCz6ZoJrC42GFm1B /ZFGlGG/k3/teCryMGhbCCotWj11VVpZmjAzselPUKXp93eC1Y4UQj7tIF9o56bM7LvV u63Tan7x6B9mxbEX3tfXwEOJJnRYqLOjDwkaRHWbBSDiUZQJKuB8YSP0OPwC6K6NdpV+ tE3A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.92.162 with SMTP id cn2mr9047450wib.26.1436908749568; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.187.234 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:19:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UFS support in uboot From: "Sevan / Venture37" To: freebsd-arm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:19:11 -0000 On 9 March 2015 at 22:51, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > Hi, > I remember a while back there was talk of getting patches resubmitted > to uboot so that it would support uboot natively, did anything come of > it? "support uboot natively" *sigh* I mean UFS! Answering back to my own post to make it easier to fish out again. "Remind me about this after 10.2 is done." - gjb https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2014-February/007529.html Sevan / Venture37