From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 7 01:00:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA27908 for current-outgoing; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 01:00:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sovcom.kiae.su (sovcom.kiae.su [193.125.152.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA27901; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 01:00:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by sovcom.kiae.su id AA23455 (5.65.kiae-1 ); Fri, 7 Mar 1997 11:45:09 +0300 Received: by sovcom.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Fri, 7 Mar 97 11:45:08 +0300 Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.ru (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA00792; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 11:42:51 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 11:42:45 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= To: Bruce Evans Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freebsd.org, rich@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6 days and counting for 2.2-RELEASE... In-Reply-To: <199703070818.TAA07512@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 7 Mar 1997, Bruce Evans wrote: > >Please, don't forget to build XFree with patches from ports, not from > >scratch. It is essential for all non-8859-1 users. > > WHat's happening with the UT_NAMESIZE mismatch problem? What is the problem? 2.2 not redifine UT_NAMESIZE, so if XFree one is different, it clearly indicates that XFree built in -current instead. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/