From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 15 20:11:12 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from 1Cust124.tnt2.washington.dc.da.uu.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E21C151FF; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 20:11:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 23:11:05 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: Kris Kennaway Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib Makefile src/secure/usr.bin Makefile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, 15 Jan 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > So you mail me about the problem, and I implement the fix (which in this > case is to finalise RSAref support by fixing the openssl code so it > doesn't unconditionally compile in the RSA crypto code). Submitting > patches to implement this yourself will of course expedite the process. > This is -current, please reread the disclaimer in the handbook if you're > still in doubt. Huh? The fix is to actually _have_ RSA in there. > Anyway, I'm now officially maintainer of the code, so this confusion won't > arise again in future, right? :-) Well, you have to realize that we all have a responsibility to not break things. Committing a library with significant missing functionality, having the same name as a preceding port _with_ that functionality, is very bad. It breaks our ports. I know you're the maintainer, but you have to really think about the responsibility of keeping things working. I'm sorry if it offended you that I backed out your hard work; it is quite necessary, while the library is still broken (defined in the "bad" definition in the paragraph above.) > > Kris > -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message