From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 16:04:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8B0106566B; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD90E8FC15; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so10661983iak.13 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:04:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=32cOE7YPV0M0Nus7F4jSoeCFOukiNcBi7OyG07ZABSc=; b=MWE8X90XzJ6M4R1ip2xUpKfVg/DSD1SJFumQ/QgBjEB9hr3508fg061l4m6I1Pbv12 I0wXfNDG+eYRAZF/rgQyUUjIzs86oiIEzQrB0i12/nhOUcdalPv22zL2gV4GftuqREXj 2KnJFDDcBDXSelRsbDB9nW0nYVjuzDid9wvLM= Received: by 10.42.41.143 with SMTP id p15mr28042749ice.9.1321373077158; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:04:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.11.140 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:04:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:04:06 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: L9YeeadsL_nhc1ieb3lZVZDzBS8 Message-ID: To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Baptiste Daroussin , Doug Barton , Bernhard Froehlich Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:04:38 -0000 On 15 November 2011 14:34, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? > If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. > I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile= (via my > FreeBSD account). > > Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any securit= y issues > by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no code c= hanges > are expected. If you can host it and maintain it, fantastic. I notice you're not a ports guy, so if if you like, feel free to send me a new url for the MASTER_SITES and I'll do the dirty work for you (no patronising intended) > P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. =A0I haven't noticed the act= ivity until > I needed to use it at yet another system. Resurrection is easy :) Thanks for helping to keep the tree in good shape. Chris