From nobody Fri Apr 14 22:32:16 2023 X-Original-To: net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PyrmK09PDz44whH for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PyrmJ62kZz47pC for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1681511536; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q/5KZ+dbsLo924VBKXJ+qWUAWlvMwv3l4tlrUlbgipY=; b=K/73x145OOGZbASOpp4/DZ+tjgxDDjUndhr9mkQCCx01fu3SJJk/IDM2OVVnVJaA8TxunW Kqa0zBDjgzRpqGwiC5y8ieeSINgWuzWlc5LM+d958r3M/r5ngaTTjE40ABezc9gbtR2+tp 69WT5dbIsfC+KDXXtZkyw+Rc74UA2zsOX86KHJ3XTAvdd4kbYRrJELS1kVrLrwbg+OQfd2 xewzLI1N/2UlujjUP6uWg1DObtXyq1VVaN0yTcrN3uupwsdjIJq6yOEkUFhsiEfTfyUSDI En6G1rvvvnlRtO2f058bOqeFJVmNpdLnzLux5BPn0tY5L6k5Y3DIyeS7jfjdDQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1681511536; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ix3/bCrAgJQiZpB1qjt2puge1s6JOks+T7sLm8C2gKF8Q6o8tQSOispENgu8g9e+0q0Sjl qnFfBSl4i0L2YMx/I4X2NM+glFE4pswZKU9H9TjZLpah5WDDL2W933qF2E1k8MH68fLX6F cSP6J1akzHMRTmt3jFvh8qygNdXdw3/Su3Qy4/B+5Ac4bIhGSxBtESJLRKdmutIyC+fFnr WGGy+VBiUG5nL2gPGLwYH+XSd++aESdjTZxS8kPSDT7LdahuJARNtoaeoQSrL7DMd1yyP0 3sicriXycCX17GPMbmzgGuFvHoUZtY73LUgjRIztA0UyH4AMFLxwbY8ztlizag== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PyrmJ58Mdzhym for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 33EMWGFb034420 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:32:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 33EMWGTG034418 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:32:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268490] [igb] [lagg] [vlan]: Intel i210 performance severely degraded Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:32:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.4-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: duerrd561@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268490 --- Comment #47 from Daniel Duerr --- (In reply to Marek Zarychta from comment #44) Hi Marek- are you suggesting I try your MTU 9004 workaround here? Please no= te my previous comment to Santiago about how this is _not_ a mixed MTU subnet. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=