From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 03:39:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB18106566C; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp6.server.rpi.edu (smtp6.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14D08FC12; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp6.server.rpi.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0V2QdEW003603; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:26:41 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20090130.105746.-1582160580.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20090130015518.GA20404@hades.panopticon> <20090130.085130.-4349483.imp@bsdimp.com> <20090130173956.GA9119@dragon.NUXI.org> <20090130.105746.-1582160580.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:26:38 -0500 To: "M. Warner Losh" , obrien@FreeBSD.org From: Garance A Drosehn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0) X-RPI-SA-Score: 0.10 () [Hold at 20.00] COMBINED_FROM X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.226 Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187132 - head/usr.bin/make X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:39:36 -0000 At 10:57 AM -0700 1/30/09, M. Warner Losh wrote: >In message: <20090130173956.GA9119@dragon.NUXI.org> > "David O'Brien" writes: >: >: 100,000 of things change within FreeBSD without discission that >: displeases some set of folks. That's nothing new, but I'm >: restoring compatibility and functionailty, not removing it. > >Don't you have any ability to judge that this might be a bad thing? >So far the voting I solicited is 100% in favor of getting rid of what >you did... Usually that implies it is a bad commit... In case someone is collecting votes, I'd also vote against the extra output. The sad thing is that somewhere I have changes to 'make' which added debugging option that helped a lot with parallel builds. One big difference was that it was an option, which could be turned on via some environment variable or something. I haven't the faintest idea what I did with that change though. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosehn@rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA