From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 21 12:34:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA17106566C for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:34:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8618FC15 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE536D450; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8DE0384549; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:34:33 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Zaphod Beeblebrox References: <5f67a8c40912182147t1adc158ew9fd3d94c4c4c955f@mail.gmail.com> <20091220052703.GA98917@dan.emsphone.com> <5f67a8c40912202147t9d9b64al88060bd8a73c28b0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:34:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5f67a8c40912202147t9d9b64al88060bd8a73c28b0@mail.gmail.com> (Zaphod Beeblebrox's message of "Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:47:55 -0500") Message-ID: <86ws0gqzdy.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: scp more perfectly fills the pipe than NFS/TCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:34:34 -0000 Zaphod Beeblebrox writes: > While the link is slow, it is really directly connected with a latency > of 10ms or so. 10 ms is pretty high. A "direct connection" (same Ethernet segment) should have a round-trip latency well below 1 ms. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no