From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 23 09:59:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA17879
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA17867
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA21586; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199604231658.JAA21586@precipice.shockwave.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.6 3/24/96
To: Douglas Ambrisko <ambrisko@tcsi.com>
cc: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp), current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: socks support native in freebsd? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:12:08 PDT."
             <199604231612.JAA00763@cozumel.tcs.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:58:05 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Yes, I know, I found the socks5 code later this evening and went through it.
It's in much better shape than that socks4 crud.  Socks5 can exist as a port
and does not need to be intrusive to FreeBSD, so that's the way I'm going to 
go.